ph_grid

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Miller, D.A. and R.A. White
Publication_Date: 1998
Title:
ph_grid
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data
Online_Linkage: NA
Description:
Abstract:
Soil pH is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of the soil. In an acqueous solution, pH is defined to be the negative logarithm (base 10) of the concentration of free hydrogen ions. In soil, the pH results from the interaction of soil minerals, ions in solution, and cation exchange. 

The mean pH was determined for each of 11 standard layers for each map unit of each state using data from the STATSGO Comp and Layer tables. The standard layers were introduced because of the wide variation in the number, thickness, and depth to top and bottom of soil layers in the STATSGO data from one soil component to another, even within the same map unit. Variable layers cause problems for many environmental models and GIS operations.
Purpose:
For use with GEOSTAC database, this data set has been compiled to simplify pesticide risk assessment and provide a common data for all vested interests.
Supplemental_Information:
The information below was compiled from the following web page:
http://www.essc.psu.edu/soil_info/index.cgi?soil_data&conus&data_cov

The mean pH was determined for each of 11 standard layers for each map unit of each state using data from the STATSGO Comp and Layer tables. The standard layers were introduced because of the wide variation in the number, thickness, and depth to top and bottom of soil layers in the STATSGO data from one soil component to another, even within the same map unit. Variable layers cause problems for many environmental models and GIS operations. 

Determining the mean pH for the 11 standard layers required three main steps: 


For each component layer, computing the mean pH. 


For each component, determining the contribution of each component layer to the 11 standard layers. 


For each map unit, combining the contributions of all components to compute the mean pH for each standard layer. 

The pH of a mixture of two soils having different pH values is dependent upon the specific chemical composition of the minerals and included water in the soils and the interactions between them. Factors such as the buffering capacity of constituent compounds and surface properties of minerals may cause the pH of the mixture to be significantly different from a simple average of the pH of soils which are mixed together. The STASGO Layer tables do include some additional variables, such as cation exchange capacity, carbonate concentration, and salinity, which might permit adjusting the mean pH for some of these effects. However, since all pH values in the Layer table are rounded to the nearest 0.1, and cation exchange capacity values are present for only about one-half of the layers, it appears that any such adjustments would result in, at best, a negligible inprovement in the final results. 

Computing Component Layer pH
For each layer of each map unit component, the STATSGO Layer table contains two values for the pH, PHH and PHL, defined as the maximum and minimum, respectively, for the range in pH for the soil layer or horizon. The mean pH for each component layer was computed as the arithmetic average of PHH and PHL. 

For non-mineral soil layers, the STATSGO Layer table may specify that the pH for a layer is undefined by giving the values of PHH and PHL as 0.0. The computation of the average ph value for a standard layer ignores component layers for which the pH is undefined. If pH is undefined for all component layers which contribute to a standard output layer for the mapunit, then a pH value of 0.0 is used to indicate that the pH is undefined for that layer. 

There were 507 component layers (approximately 0.4 % of all layers) whose TEXTURE1 (dominant texture) code corresponded to a mineral soil but a pH value was not entered or a value of 0.0 was used to indicate data not available. Roughly half of these layers had codes indicating the presense of coarse rock fragments (CB, GR, SH, ST); the remainer did not. The number of layers without valid pH for each texture code are tabulated below: 

       TEXTURE1	    Count		TEXTURE1    Count

	C               6               GRV-S          39
	CBV-L           1               GRX-COS        12
	CBV-SIL		1	        GRX-S          96
	CBX-S		1	        L              16
	COS	       17	        S             153
	FL-L		7	        SH-C            4
	FS	       13	        SICL            2
	FSL		7	        SIL             8
	GR-COS	       22	        SL             39
	GR-S	       42	        ST-SIL          1
	GRV-COS	       16	        STV-FSL         2
        GRV-L           2                           


Determining Contributions to Standard Layers
The contributions of each component layer to the standard layers for a given map unit were determined using the component layer depths specified by Layer table variables LAYDEPL and LAYDEPH, the mean depth to bedrock for each component calculated by averaging Comp table variables ROCKDEPL and ROCKDEPH, and the percent of the area of the map unit covered by each component as specified by COMPPCT. 

For each component, the layers defined in the Layer table were compared with each standard layer in turn. If the standard layer was entirely included within one of the component layers, the pH value for the layer was multiplied by the COMPPCT value to determine the weighted contribution of the component to the standard layer. If the standard layer overlapped two or more component layers, the pH for each component layer were first weighted in proportion to the amount of overlap before multiplication by the COMPPCT value. The region from the bottom of the last component layer to the bottom of the last standard layer, if any, was assumed to be the same as the lowest component layer down to the mean bedrock depth. Below this depth, the pH was set to 0. 

Computing Mean Ph for Entire Map Unit
The weighted contributions of all components to each standard layer were then summed to obtain the mean pH values for the map unit. The result was rounded to the nearest 0.1; this matches the precision of the pH values in the STATSGO Layer table. If none of the component layers contributing to the standard layer were mineral soil or if the entire map unit was specified to be water, the pH was set to zero. 

NOTE that for many STATSGO components, a depth-to-bedrock value of 60 inches (152 cm) was used to indicate that the soil was not examined below this depth, and bedrock was not actually encountered. In all cases, however, the pH was computed as if bedrock was encountered at the depth specified by the mean of ROCKDEPL and ROCKDEPH. Accordingly, the pH values for the two lowest standard layers (1.5 to 2.5 m) may in some cases be set to 0.0, indicating data not available, even though soil actually extends down to these depths.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: varies
Currentness_Reference:
publication date
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -127.899809
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -65.346369
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 51.608722
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 22.939089
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: REQUIRED: Reference to a formally registered thesaurus or a similar authoritative source of theme keywords.
Theme_Keyword: STATSGO
Theme_Keyword: pH
Theme_Keyword: 1 Kilometer
Theme_Keyword: Grid
Access_Constraints: None.
Use_Constraints:
It is important to emphasize that, in addition to the limitations associated with generalizing from detailed soil maps to representative
soil profiles in the STATSGO data, another level of generalization has been added by taking area-weighted averages over all the components in each STATSGO mapunit.  Hence, for most mapunits, the average soil profile will not closely match any actual soil profile.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Waterborne Environmental, Incorporated
Contact_Person: Spatial Technologies Group
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
897 B Harrison St SE
City: Leesburg
State_or_Province: VA
Postal_Code: 20175
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 703.777.0005
Data_Set_Credit:
Miller, D.A. and R.A. White, 1998: A Conterminous United States Multi-Layer Soil Characteristics Data Set for Regional Climate and Hydrology Modeling. Earth Interactions, 2. [Available on-line at http://EarthInteractions.org]

http://www.essc.psu.edu/soil_info/index.cgi?soil_data&conus&data_cov&ph
Native_Data_Set_Environment:
Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 1; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.1.0.722
Back to Top
Data_Quality_Information:
Lineage:
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Determining Mean pH for Standard Layers
The mean pH was determined for each of 11 standard layers for each map unit of each state using data from the STATSGO Comp and Layer tables. The standard layers were introduced because of the wide variation in the number, thickness, and depth to top and bottom of soil layers in the STATSGO data from one soil component to another, even within the same map unit. Variable layers cause problems for many environmental models and GIS operations. 

Determining the mean pH for the 11 standard layers required three main steps: 


For each component layer, computing the mean pH. 


For each component, determining the contribution of each component layer to the 11 standard layers. 


For each map unit, combining the contributions of all components to compute the mean pH for each standard layer. 

The pH of a mixture of two soils having different pH values is dependent upon the specific chemical composition of the minerals and included water in the soils and the interactions between them. Factors such as the buffering capacity of constituent compounds and surface properties of minerals may cause the pH of the mixture to be significantly different from a simple average of the pH of soils which are mixed together. The STASGO Layer tables do include some additional variables, such as cation exchange capacity, carbonate concentration, and salinity, which might permit adjusting the mean pH for some of these effects. However, since all pH values in the Layer table are rounded to the nearest 0.1, and cation exchange capacity values are present for only about one-half of the layers, it appears that any such adjustments would result in, at best, a negligible inprovement in the final results. 

Computing Component Layer pH
For each layer of each map unit component, the STATSGO Layer table contains two values for the pH, PHH and PHL, defined as the maximum and minimum, respectively, for the range in pH for the soil layer or horizon. The mean pH for each component layer was computed as the arithmetic average of PHH and PHL. 

For non-mineral soil layers, the STATSGO Layer table may specify that the pH for a layer is undefined by giving the values of PHH and PHL as 0.0. The computation of the average ph value for a standard layer ignores component layers for which the pH is undefined. If pH is undefined for all component layers which contribute to a standard output layer for the mapunit, then a pH value of 0.0 is used to indicate that the pH is undefined for that layer. 

There were 507 component layers (approximately 0.4 % of all layers) whose TEXTURE1 (dominant texture) code corresponded to a mineral soil but a pH value was not entered or a value of 0.0 was used to indicate data not available. Roughly half of these layers had codes indicating the presense of coarse rock fragments (CB, GR, SH, ST); the remainer did not. The number of layers without valid pH for each texture code are tabulated below: 

       TEXTURE1	    Count		TEXTURE1    Count

	C               6               GRV-S          39
	CBV-L           1               GRX-COS        12
	CBV-SIL		1	        GRX-S          96
	CBX-S		1	        L              16
	COS	       17	        S             153
	FL-L		7	        SH-C            4
	FS	       13	        SICL            2
	FSL		7	        SIL             8
	GR-COS	       22	        SL             39
	GR-S	       42	        ST-SIL          1
	GRV-COS	       16	        STV-FSL         2
        GRV-L           2                           


Determining Contributions to Standard Layers
The contributions of each component layer to the standard layers for a given map unit were determined using the component layer depths specified by Layer table variables LAYDEPL and LAYDEPH, the mean depth to bedrock for each component calculated by averaging Comp table variables ROCKDEPL and ROCKDEPH, and the percent of the area of the map unit covered by each component as specified by COMPPCT. 

For each component, the layers defined in the Layer table were compared with each standard layer in turn. If the standard layer was entirely included within one of the component layers, the pH value for the layer was multiplied by the COMPPCT value to determine the weighted contribution of the component to the standard layer. If the standard layer overlapped two or more component layers, the pH for each component layer were first weighted in proportion to the amount of overlap before multiplication by the COMPPCT value. The region from the bottom of the last component layer to the bottom of the last standard layer, if any, was assumed to be the same as the lowest component layer down to the mean bedrock depth. Below this depth, the pH was set to 0. 

Computing Mean Ph for Entire Map Unit
The weighted contributions of all components to each standard layer were then summed to obtain the mean pH values for the map unit. The result was rounded to the nearest 0.1; this matches the precision of the pH values in the STATSGO Layer table. If none of the component layers contributing to the standard layer were mineral soil or if the entire map unit was specified to be water, the pH was set to zero. 

NOTE that for many STATSGO components, a depth-to-bedrock value of 60 inches (152 cm) was used to indicate that the soil was not examined below this depth, and bedrock was not actually encountered. In all cases, however, the pH was computed as if bedrock was encountered at the depth specified by the mean of ROCKDEPL and ROCKDEPH. Accordingly, the pH values for the two lowest standard layers (1.5 to 2.5 m) may in some cases be set to 0.0, indicating data not available, even though soil actually extends down to these depths. 

The 11 standard layers are :

Layer     Thickness       Depth to Top    Depth to Bottom

1      5 cm (2 in)        0 cm (0 in)     5 cm (2 in)
2      5 cm (2 in)        5 cm (2 in)    10 cm (4 in)
3     10 cm (4 in)       10 cm (4 in)    20 cm (8 in)
4     10 cm (4 in)       20 cm (8 in)    30 cm (12 in)
5     10 cm (4 in)       30 cm (12 in)   40 cm (16 in)
6     20 cm (8 in)       40 cm (16 in)   60 cm (24 in)
7     20 cm (8 in)       60 cm (24 in)   80 cm (31 in)
8     20 cm (8 in)       80 cm (31 in)  100 cm (39 in)
9     50 cm (20 in)     100 cm (39 in)  150 cm (59 in)
10     50 cm (20 in)     150 cm (59 in)  200 cm (79 in)
11     50 cm (20 in)     200 cm (79 in)  250 cm (98 in)

The above selection of the number and depths of these standard layers reflects three main considerations:
The wide variation of numbers, thicknesses, and depths of layers for different components means that there are no "natural" or "obvious" choices for the standard layers.
Many models are particularly sensitive to the properties of the top few centimenters of soil; hence extra priority should be given to preserving all available information for this region.
To minimize data volumes, layer thicknesses should not be much less than the thicknesses of "typical" component layers at similar depths.
To aid in the selection of standard layers, therefore, the frequencies of depths and thicknesses of layers were tabulated for all components. This tabulation indicated that roughly 50% of components have surface layers thicker than 20 cm (8 inches); only about 4% of surface layers have a thickness of 5 cm (2 inches) or less, and about 16%, 10 cm (4 inches) or less. Deeper layers are in general thicker -- roughly 60% of all layers were at least 50 cm (20 inches) thick. The majority of components did not record layers extending below 60 inches (approximately 1.5 m); only about 10% include layers extending beyond 2.0 m (79 inches).
Process_Date: 1998
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Miller, D.A. and R.A. White
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Source data was downloaded from http://www.essc.psu.edu/soil_info/index.cgi?soil_data&conus&citation and imported into ArcGRID file format
Process_Date: 10.2005
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Waterborne Environmental, Incorporated
Contact_Person: Spatial Technologies Group
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Data set was projected to Albers Equal Area and referenced to the NAD83 datum.
Process_Date: 10.2005
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Waterborne Environmental, Incorporated
Contact_Person: Spatial Technologies Group
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
ArcINFO Command MERGEVAT applied to join Value Attribute Table from source data set to newly projected data set in order to capture all attributes.
Process_Date: 10.2005
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Waterborne Environmental, Incorporated
Contact_Person: Spatial Technologies Group
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Metadata generated by referencing source data set documentation available at: http://www.essc.psu.edu/soil_info/index.cgi?soil_data&conus&data_cov.
Process_Date: 10.2005
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Waterborne Environmental, Incorporated
Contact_Person: Spatial Technologies Group
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Dataset copied.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
H:\FINAL_DVDS\InnerCore_Level_III\statsgo_derived_conus_soils_data\pH\ph_grid
Back to Top
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Raster
Raster_Object_Information:
Raster_Object_Type: Grid Cell
Row_Count: 2896
Column_Count: 4615
Vertical_Count: 1
Back to Top
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Map_Projection:
Map_Projection_Name: Albers Conical Equal Area
Albers_Conical_Equal_Area:
Standard_Parallel: 29.500000
Standard_Parallel: 45.500000
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -96.000000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 23.000000
False_Easting: 0.000000
False_Northing: 0.000000
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: row and column
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 1000.000000
Ordinate_Resolution: 1000.000000
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222
Back to Top
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: ph_grid
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ObjectID
Attribute_Definition:
Internal feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source:
ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Value
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Count
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Muid
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L1_ph
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L2_ph
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L3_ph
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L4_ph
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L5_ph
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L6_ph
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L7_ph
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L8_ph
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L9_ph
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L10_ph
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: L11_ph
Back to Top
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Texas A&M University, Spatial Sciences Laboratory
Contact_Person: Texas A&M University, Spatial Sciences Laboratory
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
1500 Research Parkway, Suite B223
City: College Station
State_or_Province: Texas
Postal_Code: 77845
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 979-862-7956
Resource_Description: Downloadable Data
Distribution_Liability:
None
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Transfer_Size: 5.543
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: www.geostac.org
Access_Instructions:
Registered user ID and password provided by the Spatial Sciences Laboratory.
Fees: None
Ordering_Instructions:
Data can be downloaded from www.geostac.org with a registered user ID and password provided by the Spatial Sciences Laboratory.
Turnaround: Not Applicable
Custom_Order_Process:
Not Applicable
Technical_Prerequisites:
GIS Capable
Back to Top
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20060227
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Waterborne Environmental, Incorporated
Contact_Person: Spatial Technologies Group
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
897 B Harrison Street SE
City: Leesburg
State_or_Province: VA
Postal_Code: 20175
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 703.777.0005
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Time_Convention: local time
Metadata_Use_Constraints:
This metadata document is intended for use with the GEOSTAC database. It has been compiled by referencing the original data source supporting documentation (metadata not available for original, source data set). The source data and corresponding reference material can be found at: http://www.essc.psu.edu/soil_info/index.cgi?soil_data&conus
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile
Back to Top